The NBC10 Boston Investigators are uncovering new particulars concerning the lone holdout juror from the Lindsay Clancy homicide trial.
Courtroom paperwork and interviews with members of the family reveal a historical past of home violence allegations. We found a pending eviction case tied to months of not paying lease.
The NBC10 Boston Investigators additionally discovered an lively restraining order towards him, whereas he was listening to proof within the case.
These particulars increase questions concerning the jury choice course of and the way the Plymouth County resident was picked for the high-profile case that resulted in a mistrial.
NBC10 Boston has repeatedly tried to contact the juror at residence, the place his landlord is at present making an attempt to evict him.
After a mistrial was declared within the case of the Duxbury mom charged with homicide within the deaths of her three kids, we sat down with three of the jurors, who advised us their ideas on the weekslong trial and the hectic deliberations.
We aren’t figuring out him right now as a result of he has chosen to not communicate publicly and the jury record is at present impounded. Nonetheless, we needed to share the small print that specialists say ought to have raised pink flags about how he stuffed out his juror questionnaire.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror within the Clancy case confronted a prison cost for assaulting his spouse out of Brockton District Courtroom.
Based on a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew referred to as 911 after he stated his uncle grabbed his spouse by the throat and threw her right into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mother repeatedly screamed, “You are evil!” as police arrested him.
Courtroom data present the couple divorced after the incident and the prison cost was later dismissed.
The ex-wife advised NBC10 Boston this week that she didn’t need to testify within the case as a result of she was anxious about dropping custody of her daughter.
Final 12 months, that very same teenage nephew referenced within the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he stated the juror pushed him to the bottom and repeatedly punched him within the face.
The teenager wrote in his affidavit that his uncle then stated, “You ruined my (expletive) life,” for calling the police and added, “You’ve got had this coming your approach for a very long time.”
That restraining order was nonetheless lively when the juror was chosen for the Clancy trial and listened to proof for weeks within the controversial case.
“I do not see how they’d’ve allowed him to be a member of this jury,” NBC10 Boston’s chief authorized analyst Michael Coyne stated.
A panel of 18 jurors will hear arguments within the Lindsay Clancy homicide case when it begins on Monday. Here is how jury choice completed up, and the movement from the Duxbury mom’s ex-husband, Patrick, heard in court docket afterward. Plus, evaluation from protection lawyer Morjieta Derisier on how she would search to defend Clancy.
The usual juror questionnaire in Massachusetts clearly asks if somebody has been arrested, charged with against the law or been served with a court docket order. All of these packing containers ought to have been checked by this juror.
“I do not see how, if these questions had been answered appropriately, one facet or the opposite would’ve taken the prospect with permitting him to be seated,” Coyne stated.
The NBC10 Boston Investigators additionally discovered that the holdout juror hasn’t paid the month-to-month lease at his residence since final March, in response to housing court docket data.
As jurors deliberated final week, the owner secured a judgment of greater than $12,000 in unpaid lease and is transferring ahead with an eviction, housing court docket data present.
When the Clancy trial ended with no verdict, a number of jurors described how the lone holdout refused to have interaction in deliberations, describing him as “conceited” and saying he would not work together with them. One juror described the holdout juror’s conduct as “surprising.”
When the NBC10 Boston Investigators contacted the holdout juror’s members of the family, they stated he had been estranged because the incident together with his nephew. None of them knew about his involvement with the Clancy trial.
One member of the family described him as a “narcissist” who she believes by no means ought to have served as a juror in such an necessary case.
Within the wake of those revelations, Coyne stated he thinks the holdout juror’s questionnaire should be reviewed by prosecutors to see if the knowledge the juror put down was truthful.
“It’s, the truth is, against the law not to take action,” he stated.
NBC10 Boston has reached out to the Plymouth District Lawyer’s Workplace to ask about our findings, together with Clancy’s protection staff. Each side declined to touch upon Friday afternoon.
Juror questionnaires should not public data, so it is unclear if the doc in query nonetheless exists or if it was destroyed within the wake of the mistrial. Due to that, NBC10 Boston can’t verify how the juror stuffed out the questionnaire.
This story initially appeared on NBCBoston.com.
